Chapter 6 · Agent Evaluation

Turns Agent performance into comparable signals. Covers evaluation environments, dataset design, metric systems, statistical significance, observability, evaluation-driven selection, and production-grade internal evaluation and simulation environments.

← Back to main README · 📖 Read chapter text

Companion Projects

Exp.	Project	Type	Description
6-1	tau2-bench-eval	✅	Retains a pinned five-task telecom campaign (4/5 passed), raw trajectories, costs, hashes, and analysis of the wrong-line failure that skipped data refueling.
6-2	tau2-bench/	📖	Manually completes graded τ²-bench tasks and records their trajectories.
6-3	user-memory-evaluation	✅	Runs the four-level rubric over 180 structured judgments with evidence and a hallucination veto.
6-4	user-memory-system-evaluation	✅	Runs 60 cases across three systems with complete cost accounting.
6-10	user-memory-system-evaluation	✅	The full 4×3×2×60 matrix retained 1,440/1,440 real trajectories with zero errors or unpriced usage, complete retrieval/task metrics and interaction analysis, and an independently passing verifier.
6-12	openvla-robotwin2-eval	✅	The retained single-GPU campaign completed 256 episodes per action-chunk arm; chunk 1 scored 0/256 and chunk 25 scored 26/256, with all 512 rollout identities hashed.
6-2	terminal-bench/	📖	Terminal-Bench is a benchmark for testing AI Agent performance in real terminal environments. From compiling code to training models and setting up servers, it evaluates how Agents handle real end-to-end tasks. Includes a dataset of ~100 tasks and an execution framework, supporting various Agent implementations.
6-2	SWE-bench/	📖	SWE-bench is a benchmark for evaluating the ability of large language models to solve real GitHub issues. Given a codebase and an issue description, the model must generate a patch that resolves the problem. Includes multiple versions: SWE-bench, SWE-bench Lite, SWE-bench Verified, and SWE-bench Multimodal.
6-2	GAIA/	📖	GAIA aims to evaluate next-generation LLMs (those with tool augmentation, efficient prompting, search access, etc.). It contains 450+ non-trivial questions requiring varying degrees of tool use and autonomy, with unambiguous answers. Divided into 3 difficulty levels.
6-2	OSWorld/	📖	Evaluates the ability of agents to perform complex tasks within a complete operating system environment, including file management, application operation, and system configuration.
6-2, 6-11	android_world/	📖	Evaluates agent performance in an Android mobile environment, including app navigation, UI interaction, and task completion capabilities (external benchmark repo).
6-5	tts-quality-eval	✅	Synthesizes the same set of challenging texts using various TTS configurations (different model/voice/speed), then uses a multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge to score each dimension (clarity, naturalness, etc.) according to a Rubric, aggregating the results into a reproducible configuration comparison table.
6-6	elo-leaderboard	✅	Implements an agent performance leaderboard based on the ELO rating system, evaluating the relative abilities of different agents through pairwise comparisons.
6-7	model-action-threshold	✅	Compares GPT-5.6-sol and Claude Sonnet 5 at the transition from exploration to the first edit under the same neutral Coding Harness; all 18/18 cells completed without API errors, and the manifest binds the trajectories and summaries with verifiable hashes.
6-8	agent-cost-analysis	✅	Performs a full-chain cost breakdown for a typical multi-turn agent task (customer service refund): uses a custom lightweight tracing system to record input/output/cache tokens, latency, and cost for each LLM call, aggregates to identify "which step is the most expensive," and then uses A/B testing to quantify the real savings from KV-cache-friendly design and context compression.
6-9	model-benchmark	🚧	Implements the multi-provider benchmark and strict analyzer, but retained evidence contains only smoke/readiness observations; the standard N=100 cells, rate ramp, Agent-cost phase, and 168-hour availability campaign remain incomplete.
6-11	android-world	📖	In-repo T3A evaluation report and failure analysis notes on AndroidWorld (starting point for Experiment 6-11; not the benchmark source).
—	public-health-reporting-eval	✅	Uses synthetic DHIS2-style aggregate data to objectively evaluate a public-health reporting agent's tool calls, calculation accuracy, evidence citations, and unsupported claims.

Backtick-named external benchmarks must be cloned separately. android-world/ (hyphenated) is this repo's T3A evaluation analysis notes (see its README), not the same path as the external android_world/ benchmark source.

Project Types

Icon	Type	Meaning
✅	Standalone	Full code in this repo, runs after configuring API Key
📖	Reproduction Guide	Detailed doc depending on external repos to git clone
🚧	Design Doc	Architecture/implementation plan only, runnable code still WIP